Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 15:26:14 -0800 (answered 23 November 2014) I would like to find out who authored this article...
Hello Stephen,
The Orange Papers are authored by Terrance Hodgins, of Forest Grove, Oregon.
The autobiographical information is here:
Have a good day now.
== Orange
The letter said, "It is not necessary to show you have done anything wrong or that you have violated your
rental agreement."
I don't know what is going on, but it looks like I will be busy moving for a while.
I don't know what I'm going to do at this stage.
I have been thinking about getting a moderator to help out with the forum. The problem is that there is no
moderator function in the Drupal forum software. There is no position between normal authorized user and
System Administrator. The only privilege levels are unauthorized visitors who can read but not post,
and authorized members who can post, and God Of The System who can do anything and delete anything
or change anything, or destroy it all.
In order for someone to become a moderator who can authorize new registrations or delete spam or bad posts,
they will have to get God-powers over the whole system. That makes me nervous. There is
not only the question of good will and good intentions, but they
also have to be technically savvy enough to not screw things up.
So I have to investigate that too.
Have a good day now.
== Orange
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 03:20:25 -0500 (answered 25 November 2014) I have a pair of books I think you would like. They can help you add to the propaganda and debating techniques section, and also to anything you might write about critical thinking.
"With Good Reason" by S. Morris Engel
"The B.S. Factor" by Arthur Herzog Thanks for reading. P.S. Your search field is not working, at least not in Safari.
Hello Anonymous1,
Thanks for the recommendations. I'll check out those books.
Yes, I know about the search function. That has not worked since I moved the Orange Papers onto a new host
that doesn't have that search engine. I'm looking for a replacement.
Have a good day now.
== Orange
P.S.: 2014.12.09: I got "With Good Reason" from the library, and it looks quite good. It lists and categorizes and explains many logical fallacies. I can see that I will get several new entries for the Propaganda and Debating Techniques web page (sometime in the middle of the nightmare of moving, or after).
From: Michael Hello, I have been sober for over nine months and have ZERO desire to ever drink again. I have been attending AA meetings since Feb 2014. Although they have been helpful, I have had the nagging feeling they were cultish, repetitive and likely harmful in ways I could not put my finger on. My wife filed for divorce 8 months after I got sober and I believe one of the reasons is her stigma with 12 step programs and fear this would be a significant part of our lives forever. Although, with her drinking habits, there is a lot more to it. I don't want to be stuck in a life long program of recovery and want to move on with my life. At the moment, I feel overwhelmed by the amount of information on your site and would like to ask where you recommend I start? Also, if you have the time, I'd like to converse with you about this in greater detail. Thank you,
Michael
Hello Michael,
Thanks for the letter and the compliments. Congratulations on your sobriety, and your decision to never drink again.
I also have no desire to spend the rest of my life in a club where people talk about drinking all of the time.
Real recovery is just what you described: move on with your life. Go find something better to do.
Do something that is more fun than either slow suicide or talking about slow suicide.
Sorry to hear about your divorce. That is a common A.A. occurrence.
Psychology Today magazine reported that
the divorce rate in families where one partner joined A.A. was 25% in just the first year.
Now, where to start to get the essence of the Orange Papers?
I guess I'd have to recommend:
And for recovery:
Have a a good day now. And sure, we can talk more.
== Orange
[ Link here =
http://www.orange-papers.info/orange-letters419.html#Clare ]
Date: 5 Nov 2014 Hey Terry, I am one of your fans. The Orange Papers is where I go to cheer myself up. The site now comes up as "Forbidden". My server goes to Mozilla Firefox and I have complained to them already. Is anything going on? I enclosed a stamped envelope if you care to answer but can't via computer.
Thanks,
[I replied something like]
Thanks for the note and the donation. Thankful I am. The host computer has been under a Denial of Service attack.
Somebody who doesn't want people to be able to read the Orange Papers has been sending immense numbers of
page requests to the host computer to overload it and crash it.
Jeff had to move the Orange Papers to another host computer to isolate it from other customers' accounts,
and during the move, some permissions got turned off.
I explained that in detail here:
I didn't know about those problems because just after Jeff (the sys admin of the host computers) told me about
the DOS attack, I came down with a cold that has had me down for three weeks. But I'm back up now.
By the time that I learned about the problems, Jeff had already fixed them.
Thanks again, and have a good day.
[She replied:]
Date: 7 Dec 2014 (answered 10 December 2014) Dear Terry,
So grateful for the Orange Papers — glad the site wasn't out for more than a day or so.
Never saw my original letter to you posted so include it here. Have a great holiday.
Thanks for everything that you do.
Hello again, Clare,
Thanks for the letter and all of the compliments. And thanks for resending the letter. I never saw the first copy.
I don't know if it got lost during the problems with my upgrading my notebook computer's operating system,
or during the DOS attacks, or sometime earlier, but it somehow disappeared down a black hole.
[OTHER READERS: If you sent a letter sometime in the last couple of months that seems to have just disappeared,
please resend it. I know that some email got lost during those problems, but of course can't know what got lost.
Hopefully it was just spam, but obviously it wasn't all spam.]
I relapsed once, around 1990, after three years of flawless sobriety. I also found that "my disease" was not
progressing while I was sober. I started drinking again at exactly the same level of consumption and tolerance
as I was at when I quit. It took another 9 years of drinking for my drinking to increase to near-fatal levels.
It's really a shame that you have to hide your agnosticism and can't tell the truth in A.A. meetings.
And you can't "criticize the Program", or dispute the crazy things that Bill Wilson wrote in
the Big Book or 12X12.
That is one of the things that puts me off too. If I can't tell the truth, then I am not among friends.
That was why I found SMART meetings to be such a breath of fresh air.
You could actually tell the truth, the whole truth, and question any statement.
I know what you mean about the SMART meeting being full of young people. Years ago, I wrote about SMART meetings
here:
You are quite right about the woman who pounces on newcomers and declares herself their sponsor. That is a predator. One of my signatures is:
** If someone approaches you at an A.A. meeting and offers ** to be your sponsor, run — don't walk — for the door. ** You just met a vampire. It is even against the unwritten A.A. rules to declare oneself someone's sponsor. The newcomer is supposed to choose the sponsor. Always. That is to protect newcomers from slave collectors who go around drafting sponsees. It is also supposed to prevent sexual predators recruiting for their harems. I also have a possum or two in my back yard, and a raccoon. They don't need to be relocated. Alas, the 14 skunks did need to be relocated, but at least a very nice company did the live trapping and moving, and they even worked to keep the families together by releasing them all in the same place in a wildlife preserve. And then of course I have hummingbirds and squirrels whom I feed every day. And zillions of other birds. I'm going to miss this place when I am forced to move out in January. Hopefully I can find another place further out in the country where I will have even more wildlife. I want a pond with Canada Geese in my back yard. Have a good day now, and a good life. == Orange
In this case, the prosecutor declared that a 12-year-old girl died from
untreated diabetes, and the girl could have lived if the parents had gotten
the girl medical treatment. The minimum sentence for the death is 10 years,
and both parents were sentenced to 10 years. At the sentencing, the parents
cried that they never meant to hurt their daughter. Their two other children
will live with friends of the family. (Which probably means other church members.)
I wonder when the courts will start convicting A.A. sponsors for such quackery.
A.A. sponsors are notorious for
telling people not to take their medications,
and to just trust God and the 12 Steps to heal them. Too often, the results
are death or suicide.
I notice that such use of prayer is a lame attempt at magic. The people who are praying imagine that they are skilled wizards who have such great magical powers that they can get whatever they want by incanting a spell that begins, "Dear God, please gimme, gimme, gimme..." Now of course they will never use the words "wizard" or "magic" — they will say that would be "black magic" or "sorcery" — but they still believe that they can get magical results by casting spells that they call "prayers". Alas, they never studied with Harry Potter and Hermione, or graduated from Hogwart. And isn't it funny how, if you incant, "In the name of Satan and Baelzebub and all of the Demons of Darkness, I command you to give me...", that is "Black Magic" and "Demonology"? But if you incant, "In the name of God and Jesus and all of the Angels, I beg you to give me...", then that is "pious religion" and "proper God-fearing behavior". Apparently, it's just a matter of which spirits you invoke to do your bidding. Making Satan your servant is bad, but making Jesus your servant is good. (I guess we are supposed to simply ignore the fact that it is collosally arrogant for someone to imagine that he can make God or Jesus do his bidding. If God really has a Divine Plan, then I don't think that God needs humans telling Him to change the Divine Plan to suit them.)
And remember:
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 06:39:55 -0500 (answered 20 December 2014) Hey Orange Paper Dude, AA helped me to get sober and stay sober. My wife has 25 years and I have 21 years. We've been too lazy to celebrate our anniversaries, and haven't really cared to pick up our medallions regularly. Sobriety, with or without AA, is integrated in our lives. Comments: 1) AA was created by human beings, so it has its flaws. IMPORTANT: The only requirement for AA membership is a desire to stop drinking. (I'd add "the only other requirement is having nothing better to do" ) LOL 2) AA has helped alcoholics such as me interrupt the cycle of drinking, depression, and degradation of personality due to not being able to quit drinking.
3) There is a lot of truth in your study, but you dont mention that there are healthy sober people who mind there own business. Examples of MYOB are: 4) My wife and I get a lot out of attending meetings where the perspective is more diverse. 5) We want to start a YELP for AA meetings. :-) a rating of 0 means "complete disaster" and 10 means "peaceful and has coffee and donuts" 6) we are open to any debate/discussion of AA and different modalities of treating alcoholism.
Regards,
Hello Patrick,
Thanks for the letter and the opinions. Alas, the facts are at odds with some of your opinions.
That is Minimization and Denial.
The A.A. true believers claim that Bill Wilson got "The Program" from God, so it is supposed to be divine and perfect.
And I have never heard people discussing the flaws and shortcomings and failings of A.A. in any A.A. meeting.
What I get here is hate mail for mentioning the problems of A.A.
So what are A.A.'s flaws? Please be specific. We can put together a brochure to warn newcomers of the failings and shortcomings
of A.A.
It should be Council-approved Literature that is given to every newcomer who walks in the door.
I dispute that claim. Exactly how many people were really helped? Why has A.A. failed every valid medical test,
and only increased human misery, increasing the rates of binge drinking, sickness, and death?
The fact that you see a few sober people with several years of sobriety at meetings only
shows that some sober people are attending the meeting. You don't know what made them
get sober. The truth is, they quit drinking because they chose to. The fact that they yammer about
how A.A. saved their lives shows that they have been hoodwinked and indoctrinated into
believing and repeating falsehoods. Yes, they have been brainwashed.
That is not entirely clear. A few people who mind their own business do not offset crazy sponsors who kill their sponsees by
telling them not to take their medications, or the sexual predators who prey on the newcomers.
And that does not change the crazy religious dogma and misinformation that is in the official council-approved literature
like the Big Book and 12X12.
The fact that you enjoy diverse meetings does not change the failure rate of A.A., or the harm done.
That might be interesting. Who will be allowed to vote? And how many times?
How do you keep a few proselytizers from casting 100 votes each? (By using false identities.)
How will you keep dozens of members of
Clancy's Clones
or
the Midtown Group
from claiming that they have wonderful meetings, which
all of the pretty girls can safely attend?
Good. Wonderful. Let's start with this discussion:
Out of each 1000 newcomers to A.A., how many will pick up a one-year
sobriety medallion a year later? No qualifiers are allowed, like, "We will only count the people who worked the program right, or
we will only count the people who really tried, and kept coming back."
Everybody counts. No exceptions.
No excuses are allowed. When the doctor gives a patient penicillin, and it fails to cure the infection,
the doctor doesn't get to say, "But he didn't work the program right. He didn't pray enough.
He didn't surrender. He held something back in his Fifth Step."
No excuses.
So what's the actual A.A. cure rate?
Have a good day now, and a Merry Christmas.
== Orange
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 03:05:16 -0400 (answered 20 December 2014) Hello Orange! I hope you don't mind if I send this link to a short essay regarding my understanding of how AA has affected me. You opened the window to a different view for me, one that has helped me to stay sober for over a year and a half now. I hope to write soon about the importance of the question "why do I want to stop drinking?"
Yours http://inrecoverymode.wordpress.com/
Hello Mat,
Thanks for the link and the input. No, I don't mind at all. I like to get such links. More grist for the mill.
Have a good day now, and a Merry Christmas.
== Orange
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 09:34:09 -0500 (answered 20 December 2014) DisruptedPhysician.Com ---It is time for the Medical Profession to Wake Up! Sent from my iPhone
Hello Michael,
Thank you for the link. And yes, it is certainly time for the medical profession to wake up.
Sending people to a cult religion for "treatment" is unbelievable, and yet it happens every day.
I regard PHPs as an evil conspiracy. And mind you, I'm not into
conspiracy theories. I never did the "Who shot Kennedy" thing, and
I don't buy the paranoid stories that 9/11 was an inside job.
But the take-over of addiction medicine by the 12-Step cult is not
a theory, it is a fact.
A bunch of ASAM members who are mostly failed doctors who cannot
get their licenses to practice medicine back discovered that they could
make a comfortable living by shoving the 12-Step
cult religion on other doctors, nurses, dentists, and veterinarians.
They sit in judgement of other doctors as if they are superior to
the doctors are still licensed to practice medicine.
ASAM = American Society of Addiction Medicine, an A.A. front group
that exists to fools doctors into thinking that A.A. provides good
"treatment" for the "disease" of alcohol abuse.
ASAM was founded by a vicious mad-scientist doctor,
Dr. Ruth Fox,
who liked to poison her alcoholic patients with Anabuse and alcohol,
which almost killed a few of her patients. She continued doing that anyway.
She also liked to dose her alcoholic patients with LSD
because it made them more compliant.
She founded ASAM in order to sell A.A. to doctors.
We were discussing the ASAM/FSPHP conspiracy before, on the forum, here:
Also see this letter from someone else in the same
"physicians' health" trap. There we discussed a variety
of things to do to get out of the trap.
Have a good day now, and a Merry Christmas.
== Orange
[The next letter from Michael_L is here.]
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 17:37:27 -0800 (answered 20 December 2014) I buy your analysis of AA, but if we need to send a patient to inpatient treatment in order to save her job (non negotiable) where do I find effectiveness data on specific programs in the western or central US?
Chauncey P., Ph.D. — 530 xxx-xxxx
*Mindfulness is being fully aware of **here and now* *rather than being
Hello Chauncey,
Thanks for the question. Alas, you are asking one of the most difficult questions of all.
There have been very few valid tests of the various treatment modalities.
A.A. avoids participating in valid clinical studies that could reveal that A.A. is ineffective and even harmful.
However, as I have often pointed out, we have these tests results:
Dr. Brandsma's test is the only one that included Rational Behavioral Therapy as an alternative to A.A. quackery.
The results were spectacular. After several months of "treatment", the A.A.-treated patients were doing five times
as much binge drinking as the control group, and nine times as much binge drinking as the RBT-treated group.
So Rational Behavioral Therapy actually reduced binge drinking, while A.A. increased it.
(Isn't that what you would expect from a cult that teaches people that they are powerless over alcohol?)
Project MATCH was supposed to test A.A. versus a version of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, but the test was so badly done that
the results were invalid and meaningless. The "study" had no control group and was basically sabotaged by bad design.
Details here:
http://www.orange-papers.info/orange-effectiveness.html#MATCH
Perhaps SMART has found or facilitated a clinical test of SMART versus A.A. since I last checked, but I don't know of one.
You could ask here:
For that matter, here is the whole list of sane, evidence-based treatment modalities:
Many of them have forums or bulletin boards where you could ask for test results. But alas, I think that I already
know of all of the valid tests. But if you find even just one more, please tell me. I want to know all about it.
Oh, and do beware of faked tests and pro-A.A. propaganda while you are trying to find real test results.
We were just discussing yet another piece of such propaganda in the forum a few days ago:
There, someone found a pro-A.A. essay on the Psychology Today web site
by a Joseph Nowinski who was citing another faked "study" by the team of Moos and Moos as "evidence"
that A.A. works great. Alas, The International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
refuted and totally shredded the Humphreys-Moos study that supposedly showed that A.A. was just as good as CBT.
The Humphreys-Moos study was faked, fraudulent, and loaded with errors and deceptions.
See:
http://www.directionsact.com/pdf/drug_news/Miller_J_2008.pdf
And I wrote about that here:
For that matter, here is a whole list of pro-A.A. articles that show how A.A. promotes itself
with propaganda tricks and misinformation:
Now I realize that is just the opposite of what you were asking for. Unfortunately, that is what you will find the most of.
So you really have to search and check carefully to separate the wheat from the chaff. As a general rule of thumb, ALL of the
"tests" and "studies" that show that A.A. works great are fraudulent, faked, and invalid.
Now here is where I wish the U.S. Government, or the National Institutes of Health,
or National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism of the National Institutes of Health
would do a big study and test of all of the various treatment modalities.
It would be a national public service to reveal the truth for all to see.
Alas, there seems to be no "political will" to do so.
Oh, that just reminded me of this:
When Professors R. K. Hester and W. R. Miller (UNM, Albuquerque — Center for Alcohol,
Substance Abuse and Addictions, Dept. of Psychology, University of New Mexico)
rated the various alcoholism treatments
in their
book Handbook of Alcoholism Treatment Approaches: Effective Alternatives,
A.A. 12-Step treatment went so far down the list that it almost disappeared. The best treatment was
Brief Interventions, and it got a positive score of 390. A.A. got a negative score,
MINUS 82, way below zero.
Look here for the chart online:
The most successful treatment in that chart is "Brief Intervention".
"Twelve-step facilitation" is so far down the list
that you have to look for it. It's number 37 out of 48.
Also notice how 12-Step treatment has a negative success rating
— the "Cumulative Evidence Score" is a minus 82, while
the best treatments are rated positive 390 and 189.
"Brief Intervention" consists of a real doctor talking to the patient for usually less than one hour,
questioning him about all of the ugly details of his drinking and telling him that he will die if he doesn't
quit drinking. One time.
That's it. No long counseling sessions, no great guidance, no on-going advice, no shoulder to cry on.
And no 28-day treatment program.
And no meetings. There is no "three meetings per week" routine, or 90 meetings in 90 days, or one meeting per week.
Not even one meeting per year. No meetings. No "support group". No Steps. No "Program".
Just one "Dutch Uncle" session and it's over.
And that's the most effective thing going.
That kind of puts the whole expensive "drug-and-alcohol treatment industry" to shame, doesn't it?
Prof. Miller's biography (on the back of his book
Controlling Your Drinking,
says:
I don't have Prof. Hester's biography handy, but I'm sure that it is also impressive.
Have a good day now, and a Merry Christmas.
== Orange
And remember: Abstinence isn't deprivation or self-denial. It's just that I already drank my lifetime quota,
and then some more, so I'm still ahead of the game.
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 01:31:05 -0800 (answered 23 December 2014) What the hell is going on? Do you need help?
Hello Laura,
Thanks for the concern.
What is going on is the property management company tells me that the owner has decided that he wants to do
some renovations that cannot be done while a tenant is in the place.
That strikes me as a little strange, considering that this is the middle of winter, and not prime time for renovations.
You sure don't want to take the roof off or open up the apartment in this weather.
But that's what they say. And they think they are being very generous, giving me 60 days to move out. (Half of which
are already used up.)
It's doubly strange considering that my apartment is an attic and they are already charging top dollar for it.
They have raised the rent twice, from $525 to $585, and it's just an attic in a remote small town. This isn't New York City.
I don't think renovations will allow the guy to get much more rent.
It is possible that something else is really going on. Maybe the owner is a Stepper who found out who was living in
his property.
Or maybe they don't like my cluttered house-keeping style, but they have never complained or mentioned it, so I don't think
that's it. (With no vertical walls, you cannot have shelves, so storage is a problem.)
Or maybe someone pointed the owner to Stuart Hyderman's slander and libel where he claimed that I had been
busted for child molestation in a sting operation. That is a lie.
Hyderman and I got into an argument when he went on the Internet and pretended to be a doctor and dispensed
quack medical advice, including declaring that A.A. was the best cure for alcoholism.
I called him on it and he threatened to kill me. It was a spectacular meltdown in the newsgroup alt.recovery.from-12-steps.
Then he got his revenge by posting slander several places on the Internet, claiming
that I was busted for child molestation.. And Google refuses to erase those posts.
(http://orange-papers.info/orange-letters11.html#Hyderman)
(http://orange-papers.info/orange-letters255.html#Hyderman)
Hyderman isn't a doctor, and never was.
When he made up stories in the newsgroup alt.recovery.from-12-steps
about having "MD" after his
name, and having been educated at McGill University, the most prestigious medical school in Canada,
and then giving out quack medical advice on the Internet, I think he was committing a crime —
practicing medicine without a license.
So I called him on it and pulled his covers, and he hates me. So it goes.
Anyway, I don't know if that has anything to do with it, but it might.
Yes, I just might need help. The situation is that I have a month to go and I'm out of here.
I don't have like first month and last months rent and damage deposit and cleaning deposit and key depost and security deposit
and application fees and all of that.
I have next to nothing. I don't charge for my work.
I just pay the rent from month to month, living off of my small Veterans' Administration disability pension.
After I pay the rent and utilities and buy food and some odds and ends like vitamins and supplements, it's pretty
much gone. If the owner of this apartment had given me 6 months or a year of advance notice of what was going to happen, then I could
have saved up money for the move and found another place to move to. But 60 days,
including Thanksgiving and Christmas, just isn't enough time.
Then I have to hire a crew with a truck to pack up and move all of my stuff. More expense.
With that ruptured disk in my
spine, I'm not good for much physical activity. And I live on the second floor, in the attic. My back was fine
when I moved in
— another guy and I carried everything I own up the stairs —
but then, 3 years later, the disk ruptured. So I'm good for about a dozen trips up and down the
stairs, and then I'm wrecked for the day.
So right now the plan is to rent a storage locker and hire a crew with a truck to move all of my stuff into the locker,
and then hit the streets broke and homeless.
The Veteran's Administration has a program in Portland called "Per Diem" housing where they collaborate with a corporation called
Central City Concern (CCC) to provide housing to homeless veterans. The problem is that they treat all homeless vets as
alcoholics and drug addicts and require urinalysis tests and 3 meetings a week. You know the routine. They assume that
the reason you are homeless is because you are an addict or alcoholic. I went through
that CCC routine 14 years ago. And CCC is the company who foisted Harry Ketchum on me,
the crazy Stepper counselor who really did snort cocaine and rape children.
Personally, I think I'd rather sleep under a bridge than live in another CCC
property and be in another one of their "programs".
Someone else who requested that her letter not be published asked,
"Do you have any tenants' rights organizations you could contact in Oregon?"
Yes, but they say that unless I can prove racial or religious discrimination, that I don't have a case. The law
says that property owners have property rights, and they can kick anyone out without reason or cause at any time after the
lease expires, giving only "reasonable notice", and the law considers 60 days to be reasonable notice.
Now on the bright side, you know the old saying about, "If life hands you a lemon, make lemonade."?
Well, that's what I want to do. I'm looking into buying a remote place on the G.I. Bill. I am entitled to it, and
never used it, and it will come in very handy right now. I'd like to get a remote house with wetlands
and a duck and goose pond in the back yard. It can be old and run down, and a fixer-upper. That's okay. I've built
and rebuilt houses before.
If I can find a cheap place where the mortgage is about the same as the rent that I am paying now, then I am home free.
I'm told that there a lots of such places 10 or 20 miles from here, way out to the southwest, past the next rural town
called Gaston. That's just what this country is: duck and goose country.
There are lots of wetlands. Suits me fine. I just want to get into a place
that is my own and no property company can ever make me move again. I'm getting way too old for moving. I'll be 68
next month. 68 and crippled. Moving will not be fun.
Oh well, have a good day now, and Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.
== Orange
Last updated 19 January 2015. |