[ Link here =
http://www.orange-papers.info/orange-letters404.html#Gamine_H ]
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 12:31:36 (answered 6 June 2014) Ive read your 'cult test'. Its a disorganized, 100 page whine tantrum specifically aimed at AA. So don't tell me to read your garbage Orange. Have you ever seen Eyes Wide Shut? That's a Cult! Comparing AA to a cult makes you look like an idiot. The only comebacks you have are "typical cult personality to attack critics" and "minimization and denial!" Your estimate of AA is so off base, I don't believe you've ever done more than attend 1 group for a few months. At the end of every day, at every AA group across the planet, when all the people go home, there is nothing left to blame but a wall full of words. "'You'" think its a cult, dangerous, and has no solution but you fail to realize the 'traditions' and about 200 other sociological, philosophical and psychological concepts. AA is just people, Just People, who drank alcoholically and need someone to talk to, or have recovered "through" the program/fellowship and wish to HELP others. That's it! Its a wall full of words and ideas and regular people (half of which are agnostic) who virtuously want to help others like them. You routinely mention people like Bill W as if they were devils hell-bent on hurting others and world domination. Bill was an American citizen and veteran. He was a patriot who struggled the perils of alcoholism and together with Dr. Bob co-founded a safe haven for drunks. Those two men availed an emotional/psychological solution and brotherhood. All these old farts did was write some words down and try to help others but you curse them and shit on their legacy of goodwill. SHAME on you! Have you seen The Dark Knight? (its a newer Batman film) There's a guy who discovers who Batman is and foolishly thinks he can blackmail a millionaire, Bruce Wayne. You are that guy. You have a ridiculous grudge, poor logic and worse writing/organization skills and you've gone up against AA!? Alcoholics Anonymous has groups in over 170 nations. You are 1 person whose only real effect has been to defer people away from a convenient, free, promising solution--you nurse their desire to go back out and continue a cyclic pattern of alcoholism that can lead to death or imprisonment. You, running your ignorant, misinformed, resentful mouth, are making 'reservations' easier for people with alcohol problems. If you gave a shit about helping others, you would get an accurate idea of what AA really is instead of finding articles that justify your unjustifiable hate and excuse people back into behavior patterns that kill them. Spontaneous Remission!? You have got to be kidding me! Seriously, whats the difference between a person who says "God removed my disease of alcoholism" and "I "spontaneously" had a remission. Minimization?! You laugh off recovery and attribute it to "they would have quit anyway"! Take your own medicine. Whether they "spontaneously have remission" (like some divine intervention/miracle or probably how you meant it, a neurological change) or whether the fellowship of AA and the steps kept them sober long enough to establish a sensible living pattern, or whether 'gawd' really did miracle their ass into sobriety---all the same, unknowable but fortunate difference!! Maybe you should back up your spontaneous remission rhetoric with some actual medical proof, not just bullshit statistics you find. But you're not an MD are you? or qualified in the slightest to give advice about substance abuse. You probably never even drank alcoholically so your'e ranting about a disease you don't understand and a society you've judged unfairly. You really don't know anything about what you're talking about. You have not been humbled by a substance abuse addiction, if you had, you wouldn't speak as you do. You have zero humility. AA's routinely say that outside sources of help are encouraged. We get sober in AA but don't care if others have achieved sobriety other ways--good for them--glad it worked. Read page 133 of the big book! Just because there is Christian dogma, and chapter 4 is about as ignorant as possible, doesn't mean AA isn't immeasurably useful. I'm not trying to convince you, I realize you've been at YOUR sinister little game, pointing fingers at AA for years. You've probably been responsible for helping many drunks to their untimely grave, lying to them about AA, through your pride driven ego, your skewed version of truth. You're despicable. My biggest bone with you isn't your misinforming or your animosity towards AA, but with all your work you so proudly exhibit as reasons for AA dismissal. The work is grossly incompetent, scrambled, informal, redundant, littered with a profusion of hate etc...its not that you're absolutely wrong, its that you're totally wrong with no literary grace. Whatever 'good' you may daily display, whatever altruism you've employed over the years, its all becoming a wash with every second you continue this tirade against a well meaning society. Soon, if its not already happened, all beneficial trace of your impact on Earth will be soiled, and you'll just be another variable in the suffering of others. ---Truly, Neal
Hello again, Gamine, or Neal, or whichever name you prefer to use now,
Another standard dodge is, "We don't have a charismatic leader who is screwing all of the girls
and taking all of the drugs and stealing all of the money." Not now, but A.A. did have such
a leader, and his name was Bill Wilson.
An A.A. group is not the meeting room. Don't be ridiculous.
When the A.A. members go home, they are still A.A. members who believe in and promote a cult religion.
Like how you are doing.
And A.A. should never be organized, they say, except for the fact that Bill Wilson
totally organized it into two corporations with a Board of Trustees and a Board of
Directors, and a President, and a General Manager, and on and on.
There is Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Incorporated, and the General Service
Board of Alcoholics Anonymous (the "GSO"). Not organized, indeed. Bull.
I analyzed the so-called "A.A. Traditions" here:
A.A. is not just people. It is also the two corporations that I just mentioned above.
And
AAWS even commits felony fraud and perjury against A.A. members in order to get more money.
A.A. is also its front groups like ASAM and the NCADD.
Geez Louise. You keep referring to those posters of the 12 Steps and 12 Traditions as if
that is A.A.
There is much, much more to A.A. than that, including sexual predators and con artists and
religous fanatic sponsors telling people not to take their medications, and don't
see a doctor and just trust the 12 Steps to heal you...
You are really glossing things over when you claim that the A.A. members just want to help.
Some do, but many don't. You should read about the
A.A. Horror Stories
for a lot of peoples' experiences where the A.A. members didn't just want to help.
And wanting to help isn't good enough. You have to actually help. You know the old saying about,
"The proof is in the pudding."
So what is the real A.A. cure rate, without any qualifiers like "those who really tried",
or "those who thoroughly followed our path"?
And of course you just had to mention your token agnostics, as if they somehow counter-balance all
of the raving about God that Bill Wilson wrote in the Big Book and Twelve Steps
and Twelve Traditions.
And no way are half of the A.A. members agnostics or atheists. Those guys are relatively
rare because they get driven out by constant hypcritical raving about God.
There are very few atheist or agnostic A.A. groups, and A.A. occasionally even delists them,
like happened to the Toronto atheists. Look
here
and
here
for that.
Bill Wilson really was a crook and a con artist.
Bill Wilson was
a felonious embezzler,
a stock swindler,
and
a narcissistic pathological liar,
a philandering sexual predator, and
a fake holy man and a fake faith healer.
Bill Wilson and Dr. Bob just took a branch of Dr. Frank Nathan Daniel Buchman's cult religion
and renamed it to "Alcoholics Anonymous". Actually, Clarence Snyder came up with that name,
and Bill Wilson stole that too, and never gave proper credit to Clarence Snyder.
Yes, Bill Wilson was a veteran. He enlisted in the Army as
an excuse to leave Norwich University
where he was flunking out.
His big wartime adventure was pointing his pistol at his own men
and threatening to shoot them if they didn't obey his orders. You can read that story
here.
Bill Wilson and Dr. Bob did not create "a save haven for drunks". They just established a cult
religion that lies to drunks.
They created no "emotional/psychological solution and brotherhood".
The words that they wrote down were all of Frank Buchman's heretical occult nonsense.
They just sold Dr. Frank Buchman's cult religion as a quack cure.
I must be a terrible blackmailer, because I haven't received a single penny of payoff money.
Heck, I haven't even written the blackmail note yet.
And where do I send the blackmail note? Whom am I supposed to be blackmailing?
And how much money does he have?
Yes, that is quite an
ad hominem
diatribe.
You complained that I often say that A.A. members are doing that. That's because they are often
doing that just like how you are doing it now.
Objecting to A.A. members deceiving sick people with quack medicine is not a "ridiculous grudge".
The fact that A.A. has groups in 170 nations only means that it is as popular as Scientology,
not that it is a good organization. That is an attempt to use the propaganda trick called
Appeal to Numbers (Argumentum ad Numerum) to claim that A.A. is a good thing. Not so.
A.A. is not "a convenient, free, promising solution". A.A. doesn't work. A.A. just raises the
death rate in alcoholics. And I do know what A.A. is.
Yes, there is such a thing as spontaneous remission. Every disease and malady and illness has
a spontaneous remission rate where the body just heals itself. Or the mind heals itself. Or
the patient changes his behavior and lives a healthier lifestyle.
A.A. members really don't like to hear about spontaneous remission because that explains all
of the cases of recovery that they see around A.A. meetings.
Your attempt to equate spontaneous remission with God miraculously healing people is ridiculous.
When you skin your knee and it scabs over and heals, is God getting in there and miraculously
healing your knee? Why not?
If God heals drinking behavior, why doesn't God heal skinned knees?
Why isn't God necessary for healing skinned knees?
And A.A. does not keep people sober until they can "establish a sensible living pattern".
A.A. makes people worse.
A.A. makes alcoholics
binge drink more,
and
get arrested more,
and get sicker so that
their
subsequent hospitalization is more expensive.
You want me to provide actual medical proof of spontaneous remission?
Oh, I have. You apparently didn't bother to read the file,
The Effectiveness of the Twelve-Step Treatment.
You should. It's all there. Start at the beginning.
Then you complain that I'm not an M.D.? Oh, the hypocrisy. A.A. constantly brags that they
are better than doctors, and don't need no stinkin' M.D.:
Well, gee, since I'm one of those people who has cured himself of the lust for alcohol,
I must be better than a doctor too, right? Bill Wilson said so.
All kidding aside, I don't have to be a doctor to report on what the doctors found and said.
And yes, I am qualified to criticize cult religions and quack medicine.
And then you used
the typical Stepper accusation that I'm not a real alcoholic, and just
don't know what it's like. Bull. I've been to Hell and back too.
By the way, that is another standard Stepper
ad hominem attack:
"You aren't a real alcoholic. You don't know what you are talking about. You have zero humility."
The complaint that I don't have humility is especially revealing. A.A. wants everybody to be
an oppressed "humble" loser in the cult, with no self-respect, and no self-confidence, and
no ability to think for himself.
You can read about my drinking history here:
No, actually, outside sources of help are not encouraged. In an A.A. meeting,
you cannot even read a book that is not "council approved", meaning:
"official cult propaganda".
Page 133 of the Big Book says:
Yes, that sounds open-minded, but it's a fake job.
Bill Wilson talked out of both sides of his mouth on so many subjects.
The claim that A.A. is open-minded to other solutions is just a recruiting bait-and-switch
trick:
And notice that Bill's so-called "spiritual mode" was supposedly more powerful than doctors.
No, it wasn't.
Bill's group had a sky-high relapse rate. Bill Wilson was lying. Again. As usual.
At other times, Bill Wilson revealed the truth. He couldn't even keeps his various false
histories of A.A. consistent:
So much for his group being "miracles of modern mental health" and
"remarkable transformations".
That is another standard A.A. ad hominem attack: claiming that telling
the truth about A.A. kills alcoholics. That is such a common attack that
I have a long list of such accusations, and you made the list:
Now the truth is, since A.A. just
makes alcoholics sicker and
raises the death rate in alcoholics,
telling the truth about A.A. is not killing anybody.
Unfortunately, you haven't given a specific instance or example of any of your accusations.
It's all just sweeping denunciations with no facts.
That is also another
ad hominem attack.
Steppers don't seem to have many other tools in their toolbox.
You call A.A. "a well-meaning society". Good intentions is the opposite of doing good.
"Intending to do good" is failure.
A.A. "means" to cure alcoholics with
an old pro-Nazi cult religion from the nineteen-thirties,
and that is not good.
And then you finished with another ridiculous sweeping ad hominem attack.
Do you have only one string in your harp?
Oh well, have a good day now, Neal.
== Orange
[The next letter from Gamine_H is here.]
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 19:04:03 (answered 6 June 2014) Dear whom it may concern, I would just like to thank you for the twelve biggest lies of A.A. I was a member of NA for awhile and I couldn't stand it. Reading this basically sums up all of my beliefs in the program onto one web page. I will show this to many and spread the word. I cannot stand the A.A./N.A. thinkers. Who the fuck is going to tell me I CANT GET SOBER ON MY OWN?? That's the most disgusting thing anyone has ever said to me. No one has ever told me I CANT do anything on my own, I almost punched someone in the face for saying that but I couldn't or else I would have gotten thrown out of Rehab. -Marc S.
Hello Marc,
Thank you for the letter and the compliments.
And I totally agree with you about getting sober on your own. Heck, I did.
I quit drinking 2 weeks before I was even sent to A.A. meetings (by a so-called
"treatment program".) And not to brag, I have 13 years clean and sober now,
and even 13 years off of cigarettes now,
without A.A. or any "support group" or any "sponsor".
I just decided that I was not going to die that way. End of story.
Have a good day now.
== Orange
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2014 16:20:11 (answered 10 June 2014) you are, no doubt, inundated with letters of thanks daily. here is another... i have been a 'member' of AA for the past 11 years, and i have during this time, become sicker and sicker as a result. i have a medical condition, an addiction to alcohol which i feel has been exasperated over the last 11 years by membership of this selfish ridiculous cult. you are an alcoholic? don't worry , you can be cured via prayer!!! i happened upon orange papers about 5 years ago, but was told by the hardcore fraternity of AA that if i wanted to die from this disease then i were to carry on reading the information you provide. the ignorance and closed-mindedness of this suggestion has kept me sick. my obsession with alcohol comes from AA. having made the decision 8 weeks ago to cut ties with this useless organisation, my obsession has started to wane. i cannot drink alcohol but i've started to tell myself that if i wish to have a drink, then i can. because i am now allowing myself to drink, i no longer have such a strong desire to, because it is no longer something scary. i am changing my thinking. if you tell me that i cannot have something, i want it more than anything in the world, but, if i am allowed something, well, it becomes less desirable. in 11 years, i have not been sober for more than 3 years, and that was because i became ill (totally unrelated to drink). i credited AA with this miracle, but that was utter nonsense, and I did my sobriety a great dis-service in doing so. i am an atheist, but i was told that this would kill me. outrageous. i am a university graduate, but i was told to get a cleaning job because a) my sobriety came first, and b) to show some humility. outrageous. my dignity was stripped away by these lunatics. the last two months have seen a great weight lifted from me. i am back in contact with school friends, and i am applying for graduate jobs. i was told that i was not ready for work / a relationship, i was told that i was mentally ill, too intelligent to get well etc etc. my self esteem has been on the floor. i feel like i am waking up. as we already know from AA themselves, that their success rate is between 3 and 7% max. this is outrageous. thank you so much. it has been a long time coming from kerry
Hello Kerry,
Thank you for the letter, and thanks for the thanks.
I'm glad to hear that you are doing well. Welcome to freedom.
Yes, the A.A. routine is really oppressive, isn't it? They constantly harp on how
bad you are, and insane, and selfish, and dishonest, and manipulative...
They deliberately destroy your self-confidence and self-respect.
It's all part of the mind game to keep you enslaved in their cult. They tell you that
you can't trust your own
thinking and experience;
you must listen to them and they will tell you how to live. Yes, it's a cult.
That is also one of
Dr. Robert Jay Lifton's
Eight Criteria for Thought Reform (brainwashing):
Doctrine over Person.
Their dogma, doctrines, and teachings over-rule your logic, knowledge, and experience,
even when their doctrines are obviously stupid, illogical, and wrong.
In fact, they say that they cannot be wrong;
if you disagree with them, then that proves that you are wrong.
I wrote a whole long file on how Bill Wilson and A.A. hold alcoholics in such contempt:
Yes, A.A. can make people very sick. A.A. makes alcoholics
binge drink more,
and get sicker so that
their
subsequent hospitalization is more expensive,
and then
A.A. makes alcoholics die more.
Telling people that they are powerless over alcohol and cannot ever recover produces
some very nasty results.
And don't you love how you were supposed to get a cleaning job so that you would be "humble"?
They are so anti-intellectual that they just can't stand it when someone rises above their
simple-minded loser lifestyle, and gets a good job that involves brainwork and intelligence
and education.
Oh well, you are free of that now. So have a good day.
== Orange
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2014 10:00:51 (answered 10 June 2014) In case this one hasn't yet reached ypu.
Hello Jackie,
Thanks for the tip. I had not seen that.
Have a good day now.
== Orange
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 03:56:06 (answered 10 June 2014) Please circulate this announcement to friends and colleagues ... This e-mail was sent to you by the Canadian Harm Reduction Network. 55th Annual Institute on Addiction Studies 55 years of Personal and Professional Development July 13-17, 2014 The Institute on Addiction Studies offers professional development and learning opportunities to those working and involved in substance use and related fields. This year's annual Institute workshops include the following:
Location: Kempenfelt Conference Centre, 3722 Fairway Rd., Innisfil, ON (near Barrie)
For further information, please check our website or contact our office by phone or email: This e-mail was sent to you by the Canadian Harm Reduction Network. Please visit our Website and support us by becoming a member. Check us out on Facebook ... and on Twitter.
Okay, I'm passing it on.
Have a good day now.
== Orange
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2014 21:45:49 (answered 10 June 2014) Hi Orange, This is a copy of what I just send Green. Best, Frank
Hello Frank,
Thanks for the letter. I couldn't agree more.
Now just for the information of Green and whoever is listening to Green, it simply is not
true that I have refused to ever reconsider or change my position. I did, years ago.
Originally, I believed the interpretation of the people who came before me, who had the
document and interpreted it as a longitudinal study that showed the dropout rate.
After looking at it and thinking about it for a couple of years, I came to the conclusion
that it was not a longitudinal study at all. Nobody tracked the newcomers for a period
of time to see what the dropout rate was. As you said, somebody just conducted a quicky
survey one day by asking all of the people who had a year or less in A.A. how long
they had been attending meetings.
Then the AAWS staff calculated the answers as percentages of the newcomers, and graphed the results.
I explained all of that long ago. Look here:
Still, the information does reveal a huge dropout rate among A.A. newcomers. As you said, if they had a zero-percent dropout rate, then they should have the same numbers of people in each month. It would be like a pipeline with a certain number of people joining each month, and the same number graduating out as one-year winners at the other end of the pipeline. They would have 8.33% of their members in each month, and the graph would be a flat horizontal line. Obviously, that is not the case. The majority of the newcomers are in the first few months, and the people who have 10 to 12 months of membership are largely missing. What the graph shows is more like a very leaky pipeline. Imagine a pipeline with a zillion small holes all over its length. Water goes in the front of the pipe and leaks out all along its length. There will be less and less water in the pipe as you go down its length, until only a small trickle flows out the other end of the pipe. A.A. is like that. And as you mentioned, there is one huge number missing from the graph. They do not have any information about the newcomers who stayed for less than a month. We know from experience that lots of people only come to a few A.A. meetings before they are so put off by the religiosity and slogan-slinging and narrow-minded refusal to consider other recovery methods that they simply don't come back. Those people never got counted in any survey. I don't have any hard numbers, but I've heard and seen that half or three quarters of the newcomers leave after only a few meetings. Thus there is no way that Green can calculate that 26% are still attending at the end of a year. She has zero information about those who dropped out before they could become part of the left-hand data points and even enter into the mathematics.
There is one document that I have that reveals the A.A. dropout rate: The A.A. "Foxhall Group"
in Omaha, Nebraska, created a spreadsheet that was supposed to show what a success A.A.
was, but by including all of the raw numbers, they made it possible to calculate the
real dropout rate. And it was huge. They took in about 400 to 420 new members each
year, and only retained 10 of them. Only 10 new members, after a year of meetings and "working the
Steps" and praying and all of the rest of it. Here is the document: We have discussed this before, several times, and Green refuses to admit that a bunch of people dropped out before the survey was conducted.
Have a good day now. == Orange
Last updated 16 Decemnber 2014. |