Date: Fri, May 11, 2012 6:54 pm (answered 13 May 2012) Hi! My name is Rob and I've been sober for 14 months. I just finished reading the Introduction and I have a couple points of discussion. It's mentioned that: "That unethical behavior is being financed with the public's tax money and health insurance money." All the AA groups in my district here in Canada follow the 7th Tradition. To my knowledge, I havn't heard of or seen any groups in Canada being publicy funded. Isn't this broad statement then false and misleading? And, "Well, it didn't work. She relapsed repeatedly, and they kicked her out of the program." While very unfortunate if true, no decent AA group would do that to someone who is sick and suffering. Please don't paint all of AA with the same brush. Our group is open to all who have the desire to stop drinking. Your thoughts please? Thanks.
Hello Rob,
Thanks for the letter and congratulations on your sobriety.
What you are doing is trying to separate Alcoholics Anonymous from treatment programs that are
based on Alcoholics Anonymous. That is a false distinction. Now I know that legally, they are
separate entities, just like how all of the A.A. clubhouses in the USA (and Canada) are legally separate
entities from Alcoholics Anonymous The Corporation in New York City. But in reality, they are inseparably entwined.
There is no separating them.
Alcoholics Anonymous is like an octopus with many tenacles. The friendly neighborhood A.A. meeting
is only one arm of Alcoholics Anonymous the Entity.
(Or "The Evil Empire", as I like to call it.)
Other branches include two A.A. corporate headquarters in New York City — A.A.W.S. and the G.S.O. —
the publishing house, the numerous councils and intergroups around the world,
the fake medical authorities, the treatment center racket,
and a propaganda unit that would make Joseph Goebbels proud.
Those corrupt treatment programs that do kick people out are all staffed by A.A. true believers.
Those treatment programs sell the A.A. philosophy and cult religion and superstitions, just the
same as you will find in any A.A. meeting.
The treatment centers also provide employment for A.A. members who are otherwise unemployable.
It doesn't take a lot of training or intelligence
or even sanity
to tell people to go to at least three A.A. meetings per week and get a sponsor,
and then parrot some slogans at them.
A.A. very much benefits from those 12-Step treatment centers. They are a major source of new recruits for
Alcoholics Anonymous. The A.A. headquarters has never objected to those treatment centers selling A.A.
for anything from $1700 to $40,000. The A.A. headquarters was quick to
sue A.A. members in Mexico and
Germany for publishing their own translations of the old out-of-copyright first edition of the Big Book,
but the A.A. headquarters does not sue treatment centers for selling A.A.
for a big profit.
Alcoholics Anonymous also uses front groups:
In fact, that legal structure is deliberate. All of those other legal entities can promote A.A. and
commit all kinds of crimes while selling A.A. to the masses, but A.A. in New York cannot be sued for their activities.
And when a not-legally-associated allied organization does something that is particularly disgusting or repulsive,
the A.A. headquarters can object to the criticism that they receive
and claim that they didn't do it, it has nothing to do with them.
Cute trick, huh? That is why
cults use front groups.
There is more on A.A.'s front groups here:
Front groups, masquerading recruiters, hidden promoters, and
disguised propagandists
Have a good day now.
== Orange
Date: Sat, May 12, 2012 10:36 am (answered 13 May 2012) Hi again I am impressed with the way you respond to abuse from the steppers and the way that you use accredited research to answer what in many cases amounts to nothing more than slogans/one liners and rehashed hearsay. If the spiritual giants who abuse you would just take the time to step ( no pun intended ) back and look at the way they respond/relate to you they would possibly see how very unattractive their spiritual message is. I am not referring to their beliefs and the fact that they disagree with you in many instances: just to the manner in which they behave toward someone with opinions of their own. I suppose 'live and let live' only applies if they agree with someone. I read an article recently in which the author spoke of her recovery from anorexia and in which she offered some advice to others with the same problem. As soon as I read the following I realised how sensible this part of her advice was and how so different to that which the steppers give. "Don't be a full-time anorexic..... the less you're out in the real world, meeting real people, getting on with life, the more anorexia will come to define you." Recently I read in one of your letters about A.A.s sitting in meetings pretending to be sick and that hit a note as well as the above. Too often A.A.s come to believe that they are special and different and meetings are full of talk describing thoughts, actions and feelings as being ALCOHOLIC thoughts, ALCOHOLIC actions and ALCOHOLIC feelings as if alcoholics had a monopoly on these things. I always tried to say that most of what was being described was actually HUMAN thoughts, actions and feelings but too many were happy to be victims. I eventually came to believe that many were scared of going out into the real world where years of clean time counts for nothing and were happy to be full-time (recovering) alcoholics, happy to describe themselves as insane and content to play the victim until eventually becoming an old timer. If you make A.A. the most important thing in you life .... the most important thing in your life is A.A. Being sober is great and I would not be alive today if I had not stopped drinking almost 18 years ago but I am not defined by what I was but who I am. As an A.A. member I was asked to sponsor many people and one of my experiences I used to share with sponsees was about my newspaper reading habits. When I was young I would always read the sports pages first and then move on to the rest of the paper. Later I would read the political pages first. Now I read the obituaries first and have learnt that when someone dies it is not the money in the bank or the number of houses or the number of expensive cars or any number of THINGS that count ... it is the way that we have lived that is important. Keep up the good work Hugh G
Hello Hugh,
Thanks for a great letter. That is uplifting, you know. Lots of good stuff in there.
And thanks for the compliments.
I can't really think of anything to add, so I won't.
Have a good day now.
== Orange
Date: Sat, May 12, 2012 12:51 pm (answered 13 May 2012) Hi, Thanks for putting all the information together. Please allow me to offer some advice: It might be helpful to set up a companion site which is a distillation of the whole archive. Your site is packed with information and it is kind of overwhelming...no offense to your fine work but I think you repeat yourself and/or overlap information. Basically your site is an overgrown bush that needs a trimming. P.
Hi Pete,
Thanks for the advice. I'll have to think about that. Anybody else got any ideas?
Have a good day now.
== Orange
Date: Sun, May 13, 2012 9:28 am (answered 14 May 2012) Orange or whatever you call yourself, is this your real name? I've been to your website and am quite impressed. You put some work into this and I happen to agree with your reasons for doing so. In fact, I am borrowing a number of things off your web page to add to my new book on why corporate America funds the Religious right. Hope you have no objections. I am BTW David "Doc" Johnson and you can find me on facebook as well as my recently ignored and in need of up dating website http://bb.drtel.net/~old17dodge/
Hello David,
Thanks for the compliments. My birth name was (and still is) Terrance Hodgins, and I live in Forest Grove, Oregon (which
is like the furthest-out rural fringe of Portland).
I don't mind that you are helping to spread the message. Care to send a copy of your book when it's done?
Thanks.
Have a good day now.
== Orange
[The next letter from David_J is here.]
[ Link here = http://www.orange-papers.info/orange-letters306.html#Meatbag ]
Date: Sat, May 12, 2012 2:30 pm (answered 15 May 2012) Can't say I'm surprised. People, including professionals, don't even have much respect for disabled humans, let alone disabled animals. It's better to be dead than disabled, especially when you're a wild animal. Reminds me of horses who get put down for having broken legs.
Hi again, Meatbag,
Yes. And there is also a Nazi element to it, too. The Nazis claimed that they were
euthanizing people who were living "lives not worth living". You know, "the mental defectives,
and the cripples, and the chronically sick." And then the political dissidents and the Jews.
I hear the same philosophy from what I call "Nature Nazis" who recommend euthanizing wild animals
for a variety of complaints, including "imprinting". Imprinting is what a baby bird does when
it hatches out. It memorizes what its parents look like very soon. It can identify its parents
generally within an hour or two, and it has totally memorized what Mama looks like within 24 hours,
and it can pick her out of a flock and won't confuse her with some other goose, and it will
remember what she looks like for the rest of its life. Then the baby bird does the same thing
with Father in the next 24 hours.
The Nature Nazis say that baby birds that have imprinted on humans should be euthanized because
they have been contaminated with human contact and "won't survive in the wild so well".
That whole thing about surviving in the wild is an illusion. The Nature Nazis talk like
the Indians are still riding horses across the Great Plains, chasing the buffalo, and the skies are
darkened with the flocks of Passenger Pigeons, and the huge flocks of Canada Geese live out
in the wilderness and never have any contact with humans.
But that dream world ended over a hundred years ago. The Indians got moved onto reservations, and they
drive pickup trucks, and if they have any buffalo, they herd them around the reservation.
The Passenger Pigeons are extinct. People have covered the geese's feeding grounds with farms and
cities, and the Canada Geese have been moved onto reservations, too — things called
"wildlife preserves" or "city parks" — where they collect
bread tributes from people as payment of rent on their land.
I don't think fixing broken legs in geese would that be much different than fixing them in humans. I would think one of the more difficult parts would be keeping the goose from pecking at the leg.
Agreed. But I think that keeping the goose from pecking its leg would be easy.
If it is wrapped in a cast, then the leg is protected.
I feel for that goose. If I had known that a predator was going to kill her that night,
I would have made my best attempt to catch her without hurting her, and cared for her as best I could.
But getting antibiotics and preventing infection is a big problem. Painkillers and anesthetics would be nice too.
Maybe a friendly veterinarian could help.
I just looked up the lake in question (it's a big, well-known lake in the state), and apparently it does have a large Canada goose population. Also, hunting geese is apparently legal there. Bah. Never got the appeal of hunting for sport, rather than for food. "Sport"? I like the Bloom County take on it. The animals had a hunting season for hunters. When the humans were out hunting geese, the Bloom County animals stalked the humans. One of the little animals looked through binoculars and saw some human hunters, and said, "Hey! That's a Fat-bellied Stogie-Sucker, and them's good eatin'." Then the animal went over to the human hunters and asked if they tasted best roasted, boiled, or fried. And the humans reacted by saying, "Why you animals!"
There was quite a bit of grumbling about the autism-related changes,
too. Mostly from the aspie supremacists. "What do you mean we're being
lumped in with the defective auties?!" It's a shame when the DSM doesn't
correspond with your bigotry, isn't it? Amanda put things pretty well
here: Interesting. And isn't that just so common? Somebody just has to always be superior to somebody else. As for the dorm issue, I think I probably would have eaten better there if those appliances were allowed. And if the on-campus convenience stores stocked more than junk food. Or if there was actually a grocery store within walking distance. Yes, really. I shudder when I think of those junk-food diets. This is the first time I've hear anything about the Book of Mormon being edited, though I'm not surprised that pointing that out is an ex-communicable offense. My friend's still a Mormon, so most of my information about Mormonism comes from her rose-colored lenses. That, and the Internet. Yes, since the Book of Mormon is allegedly a new revelation from God that was given to Mankind on golden tablets by an angel, editing and changing the word of God is a serious issue. Kind of hard to explain, too. And about the egg, that's very exciting! My family used to have chickens, but it never occurred to me to smell the eggs.
You might have trouble distinguishing the smell of the eggs from the smell of poultry.
They are similar.
Again, it's real subtle, and I mostly get it when the egg is warm. I put my nose right
down on the warm egg, and its there. Faint and subtle, but there.
The big deal is that I'm not smelling any sulphur dioxide rotten-egg smell.
Anyhow, happy Mother's Day to the expecting Mother Goose.
Thanks. About 6 or 8 days to go.
Things are looking good. Like I said in the postscript after the last letter to you, I measured
carefully, and found that the egg is about two degrees Fahrenheit warmer than its surroundings.
That is a very good sign. That is how it should be. The gosling is a warm-blooded little bird with a hot
body, and it is starting to establish its own body temperature. (That takes a while. Even newly-hatched
babies have trouble keeping themselves warm. That is why they return to Mother and cuddle with her
often when they are very young.)
Have a good day now.
== Orange
[The next letter from Meatbag is here.]
Date: Mon, May 14, 2012 1:32 pm (answered 14 May 2012) Hi There, I am curious if you are the person responsible for adding content to the following page:
If not, feel free to forward me on to the correct person! I came across your page during my research for a project for which I am contributor. It is a resource that provides a comprehensive overview of the criminal justice system, with a critical look at the impact technology has had on the system. For professionals present and future, it offers articles on a wide range of legal and criminal justice topics ranging from ethics to basic career insights. I would love to send over more details about this project, and partner with you to have it listed as a resource link on your site. Let me know!
Thanks for your time. I look forward to working with you! High achievement always takes place in the framework of high expectation. Charles Kettering
Hello Camille,
That post was done by one of my correspondents. If my memory serves
me right, that person was in A.A. for many years before quitting
it and criticizing it as a fraud.
Still, I'd be interested in hearing about your project.
Have a good day now.
On 14 May 2012 23:05, Orange <orange-p@orange-papers.info> wrote:
Hello Adrian,
Thank you very much. That helps.
Have a good day now.
== Orange
Date: Mon, May 14, 2012 2:15 pm No problem. I had been very much hoping there was an alternative to AA, having spent some time on an online chat server for AA people. I really hoped I could quit drinking in the same way I have quit smoking, I hate to think I'm "helpless" — your pages made me realise there is no mystical rubbish I need to go through, it gave me back what I suspected, that it's down to me alone whether I drink or not. That's worth a few dollars and a big thanks :) Keep up the good work.
Date: Tue, May 15, 2012 10:24 am (answered 16 May 2012) Hi A. Orange, I found your website when I did a Google search on the efficacy of AA in treating alcoholism. I have had doubts regarding their philosophy and from the very first meeting (I've only been to 2 so far), I felt a cult-like atmosphere although everyone seemed to be very nice and nonjudgmental. I believe you are correct when you say that if a person is truly "sick and tired of feeling sick and tired" they will stop drinking; humans can think and make decisions on their own if they are truly motivated to change (Free Will). I always drank and did drugs as a teenager but straightened out when I had my first child. I had times when I drank too much but it never became an ongoing bad habit until my mother died in April of 2009. I gradually began to drink more and more over the last 3 years, and on Sunday, May 13, 2012, Mother's Day, I out did myself by drinking more in 1 day than I've ever had before. On Monday, I woke up and just felt that I don't want or "need" to drink anymore. Granted I have 1 bottle of tequila hidden but I'm not getting rid of it just yet because I want to prove that even though it's there, I don't want it. It's no different than passing by the liquor store without going in. I just have a different state of mind that I can't explain but I think it's connected to the sick and tired sentiment. When I woke up yesterday still drunk, followed by a racing heart beat, sweating then feeling cold and then feeling weird (DTs???) and generally "sick and tired" yet I didn't feel my usual sadness and guilt and desire to start drinking again to make everything go away! I haven't hit rock bottom and don't want to. However, the person who talked me into going to the 1st meeting, (my former boss) is becoming as persistent as the Jehovah Witnesses that I opened the door to back in Feb. when I felt sad, but when I explained that I simply am not interested in their religion in March, they don't bother me anymore but just leave their Watch Tower newspaper at my door. I guess, I'll have to explain the same thing to my old boss. I felt that these AA people were slaves to their dogma, and I will not be sold into this mind control "fellowship." I really think that some of these people have good intentions but they trade one addiction for another and that addiction is AA. My father was an alcoholic who quit without AA. My aunt said he went to a few meetings but it wasn't for him and I now know why. He was very intelligent and not the type to be told what to do. He ran his own, and very successful, business for 30 years and once he was in his 50's he never had a relapse to return to binge drinking. He quit on his own because he was sick and tired of feeling sick and tired! Well, that's how I feel and I'm confident that I will do it. Just wanted you to know that I find your website very informative and it also speaks to the way I perceived my brief experience with AA. Sincerely, Darlene
Hello Darlene,
Thank you for the letter. I'm sorry to hear about your suffering, but I'm glad that you are rising above it.
And yes, of course I agree that you can and will just quit without a mind-control cult telling you what to do.
That is
how the vast majority of successful people do it.
So have a good day, and a good life, now.
== Orange
Date: Tue, May 15, 2012 5:21 pm (answered 18 May 2012) thanks for your article. i have felt this way for many years. rgb
Hello Rob,
Thanks for the thanks. and you have a good day too.
== Orange
[ Link here = http://www.orange-papers.info/orange-letters306.html#Meatbag2 ]
Date: Tue, May 15, 2012 8:10 pm (answered 18 May 2012) "Surviving in the wild" is a farce. There are entire species of animals that have lost the ability to survive in the wild. Should we just kill them all? Besides, what makes a human's backyard less natural than the middle of a forest or the side of a lake? What's wrong with being a pet, as long as the animal is treated well?
Hi again, Meatbag,
Quite right.
And there is also the issue of adaptability. Some species have shown amazing flexibility
and versatility in adapting to a changed environment. And some have not.
I fear for the Great Spotted Owl. Those things are so fragile that if you stare at one cross-eyed
from ten miles away, it falls out of the tree dead. I'm exaggerating, but only a little bit.
We have to preserve a lot of old growth forest for them to live in (here in Oregon), and they still might not make it.
They don't seem to want to live or nest within 10 miles of a human, and that really restricts their
territory.
On the other hand, things like rats, cockroaches, Rock Doves (aka "pigeons"), starlings
and sea gulls are indestructable. Nothing will get rid of them. I'm sure that they would all survive
World War III.
And Canada Geese have made the transition too. A little-known fact is that they nearly went extinct in
the nineteen-fifties from over-hunting. But they seem to have actually changed and adapted, and of
all things, found new homes in city parks.
It seems like they have actually figured out where hunting is allowed, and where it is not, and of course
they prefer to hang out where hunting is illegal. It's as if they know that hunting in city parks is illegal.
Maybe they just learn by observation.
Last winter, I made a trip into Portland, and went to visit and feed my geese friends in Waterfront Park.
I was amazed to see large numbers of wild Cackling Geese from Alaska all over the park,
even calmly grazing a mere six or ten
feet away from rushing traffic. And they didn't move when people walked right by them.
I was thinking, "Hey, aren't you little guys supposed to be native to the tundra of Northern Alaska? How did you
get to be so familiar with people and cars and city parks? Have you been hanging out in downtown Anchorage?"
Also, when I was caring for goslings, I was amazed at how quickly they could adapt to living with a human, and accept a human as their foster parent. Like after only 12 to 18 hours, they were at home with me. Two days, and we were inseparable. I don't know of any other bird species that is so adaptable. The contrast between them and Spotted Owls is unreal. Yeah, the cast would help, but the goose could still peck through it if it's desperate enough. It definitely would be a good idea to find a sympathetic vet. Maybe you could check out a few vets and mention your egg. I would think a vet who would support your efforts would also be helpful with geese with broken legs.
Yes, I'll have to ask around. I'd even like access to an X-ray machine, just to see
whether the bones are aligned right.
The breaks have all levels of severity. I've nursed a couple of geese
with broken legs back to health
just by feeding them (and leaving them free out in Waterfront Park and just visiting them
and feeding them every day).
Now they didn't have really serious compound breaks or open wounds.
They just had to stay off of the leg for a few weeks or months and it healed.
(And they can swim with just one leg.)
But the ones with open wounds, and bad breaks where the leg is just flopping around,
always died. Those would require capture and a cast and good care, and maybe antibiotics.
And painkillers would be kind.
Heh, that sounds amusing. I can understand hunting for food, since a hunted animal will likely have had a higher quality of life than your average, factory-farm-raised livestock. (I don't have a problem with meat-eating in and of itself, but our meat industry could do with some reform.) Hunting just for a trophy, on the other hand, is a little disturbing. As for how a human should be cooked for best taste, I vote fried. Everything tastes better fried. Yup. No kidding. Reminds me a bit of how poor white people used to hate black slaves, which only benefited the rich white people. Hell, racism from poor white people still benefits rich people today. If the plebeians are fighting each other, they won't fight you. Divide and conquer. The junk food diet certainly didn't do me any good. I didn't eat enough, I felt sick all of the time, and my blood pressure dropped low enough that I had trouble standing up without going into orthostatic hypotension. Ouch! I would very much love to hear an explanation for editing what's supposed to be the word of God. Although even mainstream Christianity's hands are not clean in that regard.
Quite correct.
Do you remember the short-lived TV series called "Dinosaurs"? (About 20 or 22 years ago.)
It was a comedy that used dinosaurs as its characters.
In one episode, the starring family's child was declared to be the new Holy Messiah
by the local religion. The High Priest read the Scriptures, "The mother will be beautiful and pure, and the father will be
brave and noble and wise." After hearing the child's father speak, the Priest said,
"Get the white-out." Then he wrote in the Scriptures, "And the father will be a blithering idiot."
Ah yes, the fate of many a "holy book".
Yeah, not smelling rotten egg is a very good sign. Rabbits are kind of the same way about body heat. I used to raise rabbits, and it took my does a litter or so to figure out that the kits needed to stay warm to live. Single kits also have trouble staying alive because it doesn't have siblings to huddle with.
Hmm, interesting. Fortunately, single goslings don't have it so bad.
Now they may miss having a bunch of siblings to hang out with, but it isn't essential. Then again,
they might not miss siblings. Having a loving parent to cuddle with is what is essential.
Have a good day now.
== Orange
Date: Wed, May 16, 2012 6:43 am (answered 18 May 2012) very well thought and correct for as far as I can tell, you give no alternatives besides a therapist. most people who attend those meetings have neither insurance or 60-100hr for therapy. I have found only one alternative (which I am attending first meeting tonight is an hour away from my house) smartrecovery. I know nothing about it other than what they posted online. you seemed to have done your homework on why AA sucks, have you also done such for available alternatives? if so, please share with me so I can pass on the info as well. thanks, Fellow NON- alcoholic, just behaviorally challenged Brian
Hello Brian,
Thank you for the question, and thanks for the compliments.
I don't know what you were reading, but I'm not very enthusiastic about
therapists. I sure do not recommend them as the best treatment, or the first choice.
More like as a last resort. (Perhaps because my own experiences with therapists and counselors led
me to believe that most of them are incompetent.)
Here are my usual recommendations:
Have a good day now.
== Orange
[ Link here = http://www.orange-papers.info/orange-letters306.html#Andrew_S ]
Date: Wed, May 16, 2012 5:27 am (answered 18 May 2012) Agent Orange, You have shown your true colors. I called you out on your lack of logic, pervasive bias against AA and paranoid theories about organized medicine. You don't have an adequate reply to those accusations because they are apt. I could tell that you were a crank from your homepage:
*THE ORANGE PAPERS (Where are the papers? This appears to be a website. Is it like the Pentagon papers? If it says papers a bunch of experts in addiction must have written it...)* You are giving medically unsound advice to people. You are encouraging them to "go it alone" regardless of what treatment they may need. You are telling them that speaking to a therapist about their history is tantamount to a Buchmanite confession. Please consider what the ramifications are for your readers. AAs are dismissive of psychiatric drugs and other therapies. I am starting to think that you share that same illogical attitude. Andrew
Hello again Andrew,
I have thought long and hard about the ramifications of my advice to others, and also about
the ramifications of Alcoholics Anonymous pushing an old cult religion from the nineteen-thirties as
a cure for alcohol addiction.
While no one has a sure-fire easy never-fails answer, Alcoholics Anonymous has one of the worst track
records in the world, with
the highest death rate
and
the highest relapse rate and binge drinking rate.
This has been observed, measured, and documented repeatedly, and by real medical doctors, too.
The things that I recommend
have much higher success rates. And that is the bottom line, isn't it?
Does a method or treatment or therapy cure more people, or kill more people?
And I certainly do not tell people to avoid medications when they need them.
So, do you recommend foisting
an old pro-Nazi cult religion from the nineteen-thirties
on sick people,
and lying to them, and telling them that it works great when it doesn't?
Why don't you think about the ramifications of that for a while?
Have a good day.
== Orange
[The next letter from Andrew_S is here.]
Date: Wed, May 16, 2012 1:59 pm (answered 18 May 2012) Agent Orange, After reading your out-patient experience, I can only say mine was word-for-word what you went through. What pisses me off the most is the M.D. running the program kicked me out after 90 days sober, two sessions before the end of the whole thing. The reason? I didn't attend enough AA meetings, which is true because I was holding down a full-time job and trying to be a father to two great kids. Anyway, this Dr. screamed 12-steps from high heaven. He also billed me for consultations that never happened, but that's another story. During one brief meeting I did tell him I thought my issues stemmed from some childhood abuse, and the binging came on during high stress periods. He didn't want to hear my story, basically saying every drunk wants to be unique (terminal uniqueness). Flash forward a few years and I find the same doctor consulting for a non-12-step rehab called The Exclusive in Hawaii. It seems their model is to try to find the underlying issues for one' self destruction. I did a little research and found this doctor is still with Pacific Coast Recovery, still pushing 12-steps, but on the side working for the high-end rehab in Hawaii. You can find him online. His name is Dr. Daniel Headrick. He, like Dr. Drew, is a general practitioner who chose to work in one area that requires little extra schooling and has hardly no oversight: addiction specialist. The whole nonsense of it all has created a lot of anger in me, but that anger seems to keep me from going off the deep end. I do find that you seemingly deliver your thoughts and information without much anger. For that I congratulate you. Keep up the good work. The attacks will obviously continue, but one fact remains: the rehab industry claim addiction is a disease, but the #1 method they prescribe to treat it is a spiritual cure. It's time for more people to scream and shout about these contradictions and M.D.'s like Dr. Headrick who see no problem in the way they're treating people. Best of luck, Steve E>
Hello Steve,
Thank you for the letter. And congratulations on your sobriety.
I'm sorry to hear about the garbage that you had to go through.
There is just so much of that quackery going around, isn't there?
Well, hopefully, when we continue to shine the spotlight of publicity on the fraud that is called 12-Step
treatment, we can change the situation. It's certainly worth a try.
And I think we will succeed, and are already succeeding in part. I was just speaking with a candidate
for the state legislature here about such quackery and bad treatment wasting precious state money (like pulling
dollars out of the Oregon Health Plan),
and he commented that one of the highest-ranking state officials (whose name I won't print here for now)
is an ex-alcoholic with 18 years sober,
and one of his pet causes is better treatment programs for alcoholics.
Apparently he has seen the hoax too.
So there is hope, and reason to believe that we will make progress.
The truth will out.
Have a good day now.
== Orange
Last updated 26 December 2013. |